- Austin Limo & Taxi Drivers Don't Want To 'Pay The Price' Anymore
- Austin TNC Drivers Push City To Dump Proposed Regulations
- Perry campaign will have 1 paid staffer in Iowa
- Hundreds Of New Laws Take Effect In Texas
- Racing Commission Suspends Operations Amid Funding Squabble
- Latest Texas School Finance Case Reaches State Supreme Court
- Kentucky clerk still won't issue same-sex marriage licenses
- Perry Campaign Will Have 1 Paid Staffer In Iowa
- 2011 Budget Cuts Still Hamper Schools, Data Shows
- Abbott Wants New Abortion Limits Following Undercover Video
- August is buy month for federal regulators
- Sex slavery in ISIS
- Trump, Cruz To Hold Joint Event To Blast Iran Deal
- Texas Attorney General Paxton Pleads Not Guilty To Fraud
- Perry On Campaign Struggles: I'm Not Giving Up
- How low will gas prices go?
- Perry, Santorum Presidential Hopes Undercut By Own Donors
- Are GOP candidates trying to out-Trump Trump?
- Former intern for Texas legislature charged with manufacture or possession with intent ot deliver controlled substances
- Austin Sues Texas Over Property Tax Appraisal System
- Battle Over School Funding In Texas Set To Continue
- Abbott: Indicted AG Paxton Innocent Until Proven Guilty
- WATCH LIVE: Donald Trump rally in Alabama
- LIVE STREAM: Join us for a Town Hall discussion on campus carry
- Comparing Bill and Hillary Clinton's scandals
- Taking New Steps To Put An End To 'Revenge Porn'
- Police: Man who beat homeless Mexican said 'Trump was right'
- City Council Votes In Favor Of Conditional Use Permit For East Austin Farm
- Cheating website subscribers included White House, Congress workers
- ISIS territory: one year later
- Luckless At Capitol, Minimum Wage Advocates Go Local
- Ethics fray puts Texas AG Paxton's office against big donor
- Deez Nuts For President? Independent Candidate Has Strong Showing In Polls
- Asked If She Wiped Email Server, Clinton Says, 'What, Like With A Cloth?'
- New Travis Co. Courthouse To Appear On Nov. Ballot
- Texas AG Paxton Re-indicted
- 305 more Hillary Clinton e-mails deemed 'questionable'
- George Zimmerman Confederate flag painting the prize in 'Muslim-free' gun store contest
- Interim Committee To Take A Closer Look At Jail Safety
- Top Texas Official Won't Apologize For Muslim-Bombing Post
- Reluctant Kentucky clerk gets time for gay marriage appeal
- Austin Panel Set To Consider Water Fluoridation Proposal
- Connect To Congress: Rep. Roger Williams
- Trump still tops polls as first policy plan is released
- Parents To Be Guaranteed Right To Bury Stillborn Babies
- Iran's Ayatollah releases anti-American, anti-Israel book
- HELP WANTED: Inspectors General needed
- Texas police officers' 'All Lives Matter' Facebook post goes viral
- Group of Iraq war veterans oppose Iran nuclear deal
- Defying order, county clerk won't give gay couple marriage license
Future Of ACA Subsidies In Texas Unclear After Rulings
Updated: Tuesday, July 22 2014, 05:25 PM CDT
Opposing rulings from two federal courts Tuesday left unclear the future prospects of federal financial aid to Texans who qualify for assistance to purchase health insurance under the Affordable Care Act.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that the ACA legislation made federal subsidies available only to individuals who purchased insurance through state-run exchanges. That would make federal subsidies illegal in the 36 states, including Texas, that use the federally-facilitated insurance marketplace.
That announcement was followed by a decision from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Virginia, which ruled that individuals who enroll using federally-facilitated exchanges are eligible to receive subsidies.
Texas, like dozens of other states with Republican leaders, declined to create its own state-based insurance exchange under the ACA. Instead, Texas relies on a federally managed marketplace. More than 730,000 Texans enrolled for health coverage through the federal marketplace during the first period of open enrollment.
As part of the federal health reform law, most people are required to purchase health insurance this year or face tax penalties. The federal government is paying part of the bill for the 84 percent of the Texans who purchased coverage through the federal exchange and qualified for subsidies. Those people are receiving $233 in monthly tax credits, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Despite the 2-1 ruling from the three-judge panel in D.C., the Obama Administration has said that individuals who accepted federal subsidies will continue to receive financial assistance. Federal attorneys are expected to appeal the ruling to the full 11-member D.C. Circuit Court, which includes seven Democratic appointees and four Republican appointees.
If the courts decide that subsidies are legal for only those enrolled in state-run exchanges, federal lawmakers could pass legislation to authorize subsidies for enrollees on the federal exchange.
But the Texas Congressional delegation, which is mostly Republican, has been fiercely opposed to the federal health reform law. U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, called the D.C. Circuit Court ruling a "repudiation of Obamacare" and its "lawlessness."
At the state-level, Texas' Republican leaders have also staunchly opposed the ACA since it was passed in 2009, rejecting both a call to expand Medicaid eligibility for young adults and a call to create a state-run insurance exchange.
If the courts rule that those who enroll in the federal marketplace are not eligible for subsidies, state legislators would have to decide whether to create a state-run exchange so that Texans would qualify for the subsidies, said Stephanie Goodman, spokeswoman for Texas' Health and Human Services Commission.
"This case is a long way from settled, but there are several options if the federal exchange is ultimately struck down," Goodman said in an email.
Gov. Rick Perry's office did not respond to a request for comment on whether he would consider launching a state-run marketplace if the courts rule against subsidies for federal marketplace enrollees.
Opponents of health care reform in Texas have previously cited the subsidies as a reason for generally low enrollment in a state where roughly a quarter of the population is uninsured. They have argued that Texans are apprehensive about accepting the subsidies, which are based on income, because they may be required to return the money if their income changes.
Individuals whose annual incomes range from one to four times the federal poverty level -- $11,490 to $45,960 for an individual and $23,550 to $94,200 for a family of four -- typically qualify for the subsidies.
Christine Sinatra, state spokeswoman for Enroll America, which has worked to enroll individuals in the federal marketplace, said the availability of financial assistance was "obviously a big factor" for that encouraged many in Texas to get insurance.
"What's most important at this stage is for consumers to know that no one will lose their coverage or their financial help while this judicial process plays out," Sinatra said. "And today's decision isn't making anyone newly uninsured."
This story was produced in partnership with Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent program of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit, nonpartisan health policy research and communication organization not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.
This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at http://www.texastribune.org/2014/07/22/future-texans-aca-subsidies-unclear-after-rulings/.